Interview-based assessments

Assessments built on real situations

Profile your team's strengths, test alignment, map who owns what, measure engagement, diagnose your culture.

Or set up a cohort

24of 24

Cohort reportStrengths ProfileOperations managers · 3 languagesAll interviews complete

One report for the whole cohort

Plus an individual report for each participant.

70Cohort average

Top StrengthsStrong · 81

Leaned On ForStrong · 86

Comes EasyStrong · 74

Where It CostsDeveloping · 47

Where to DeploySolid · 63

Every dimension averaged and banded

Across all 24 participants.

Published frameworks Ren scores against.

Behavioural Event Interview (BEI)Overplayed-Strengths / Derailers ResearchFive Practices of Exemplary Leadership (Kouzes & Posner)Emotional Intelligence (Goleman)Dual Process Theory (Kahneman)Organisational Culture (Schein)Psychological Safety (Edmondson)Big Five (OCEAN)Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan)Schwartz Theory of Basic Human ValuesCompeting Commitments

How it works

From setup to results in three steps

No tick boxes to guess at. Ren asks questions that reveal how each participant behaves.

Set up your program

Share your objectives, situation and values to set the scene.

Invite participants

Ren asks each person questions shaped to their role, in the language they choose.

Review results

Each participant gets a scored report, with the evidence behind every score.

Set up your program

Share your objectives, situation and values to set the scene.

Invite participants

Ren asks each person questions shaped to their role, in the language they choose.

Review results

Each participant gets a scored report, with the evidence behind every score.

Our catalogue

Pick one of our 11 assessments

For individuals

Strengths Assessment

Find your strengths

View sample Top StrengthsLeaned On ForComes EasyWhere It CostsWhere to Deploy Start this assessment

Behavioural Profile

Profile your behaviour

View sample Decision MakingConflict and ChallengeCommunicationAmbiguity ToleranceCollaboration Orientation Start this assessment

Leadership Self-Assessment

Profile your leadership style

View sample Decision-MakingCommunicationStrategic ThinkingPeople DevelopmentPressure Response Start this assessment

Founder Readiness

Test founder readiness

View sample Financial ReadinessPersonal ReadinessCapability FitMotivation Start this assessment

Values Clarification

Clarify your values

View sample Lines HeldRepeated ChoicesWhat You RefusedRevealed ValuesValue Tensions Start this assessment

What participants see

Watch Ren run an assessment

Video coming soon

See facilitator setup →

AssessmentFramework

Behavioural Event Interview (BEI)McClelland, D. (1973)

Overplayed-Strengths / Derailers ResearchKaplan, R. E., & Kaiser, R. B. (2009)

Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership (Kouzes & Posner)Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017)

Emotional Intelligence (Goleman)Goleman, D. (1995)

Dual Process Theory (Kahneman)Kahneman, D. (2011)

Organisational Culture (Schein)Schein, E. H. (2017)

Psychological Safety (Edmondson)Edmondson, A. (1999)

Big Five (OCEAN)Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992)

Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan)Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985)

Schwartz Theory of Basic Human ValuesSchwartz, S. H. (1992)

Competing CommitmentsKegan, R. (1982)

Our methodology

Frameworks paired to close known gaps

Every published framework has known limits. We mapped the leading frameworks, found where each one falls short, and paired it with another that covers the gap. Every report names its frameworks and the dimensions each one grounds.

Strengths AssessmentThe behavioural interview finds your strengths. Research on overused strengths shows what they cost.

See the science behind →

Where It Costs

Your score · 44

90For each top strength, the cost-side is named specifically and owned. Subject can describe concrete moments where overplay produced damage — and the watch-signal that surfaces the pattern next time.

70Cost-side is acknowledged for most strengths with at least one specific example. Watch-signals are partial.

50Cost-side is recognised abstractly. Subject knows that overplay exists but cannot point to specific instances or signals.

30YOUR BANDCost-side is largely unexamined. Strengths are described as net-positive with no real watch.

10Subject does not engage with the cost-side. Strengths are claimed as uncomplicated.

ExcellentStrongSolidDevelopingEmerging

Transparent scoring

See why every score was given

Participants see the behaviour that earned their score, and what the next band up looks like. You can check every figure by hand and explain any result in a debrief.

From a sample Strengths Profile. Each band reflects the whole conversation, never the best single moment.

41 languages

Assessed in their first language

People explain themselves best in the language they think in. With Renatus, a participant takes the assessment and reads the results in their native language, whilst you review them in yours. You can review a group that speaks many languages at once.

JA日本語Takahashi

ESEspañolGarcía

DEDeutschWeber

PTPortuguêsSilva

Facilitator viewEN

TakahashiA strong leader with a clear read on team pressure68/100

GarcíaBuilds trust quickly with new clients74/100

WeberEthics flagged during the pricing scenario59/100

SilvaDecides fast and explains the reasoning81/100

Each participant answers in their own language. You read every report in English. Scores and figures are checked so translation cannot change them.

Our reports

See cohort reports →

Our pricing

Pay per assessment, or subscribe and save

Set up a cohort and invite participants at no cost. You're charged only when a participant completes an assessment.

Start your free trial

Pay as you go$25ea

Starting price. Volume discounts apply

Subscribe for teams$100/mo

Up to 80% saving. Free for 7 days. Cancel any time.

Questions

Questions Questions

Can participants game the assessment?

There are no options to choose from, so there is no expected answer to guess. Ren asks for specific situations and follows up until it has the detail. General claims without an example score in the lower bands. In the Strengths Profile, someone who shows only their successes scores lower, because one dimension scores what a strength has cost them.

Whether a market is real, where it is growing, and where the opportunity sits

How an entire industry is structured, who controls it, and where it is heading

Who controls a market, how they compete, and where the real gaps are

Who buys in a market, what drives their decisions, and where the unmet needs are

What competitors charge in a market, how pricing is structured, and what customers will pay

Who supplies the critical inputs to a market, how concentrated it is, and what switching costs

The technology deployed in a sector, and where competitive advantage moves next

How product reaches the buyer in a market, and where channel power is shifting

Financials, leadership, strategy, and reputation on a company

Deep dive into how a company operates strategically, and where it is most exposed

Revenue, margins, cash, debt, and auditor signals on a company

How a company is perceived across customers, employees, media, and ESG

Discover a country's GDP, political environment, infrastructure, and outlook

Discover a city's GDP, economic drivers, workforce, and trajectory

Trade flows, tariffs, agreements, and friction points between two countries

Background, current state, key actors, evidence, and where an issue is heading

What a policy does, who wins and loses, and how it lands in practice

The specific risks facing a market — ranked, evidenced, and with the signals to watch

Single-source exposures, concentration, and trade-route risk for a market

Climate, governance, social, and controversy risk in a sector

Pending legislation, enforcement shifts, and where the rules are likely to change

Licensing, compliance, recent changes, and pending legislation in a jurisdiction

Government stability, policy direction, and the political risks facing a market

What a role pays — verified across named salary databases and job posting data

Whether to take a job at a company, with the evidence behind the answer

Who the credible candidates are, what they earn, and how the search will unfold

How a career in an industry works — entry, paths, pay, and prospects

The three things that will move a business forward this quarter

A 90-day plan that turns a strategy into something a team can act on Monday

Segment, positioning, channels, and pricing — tested against each other so the four hold together

A positioning the market can place — and a category claim worth defending

A pricing strategy that the market accepts and the business can defend in negotiation

Dashboard, thresholds and owners

Dashboard, thresholds and owners

Targets, thresholds and cadence

Whether an opportunity is worth pursuing — with conditions or risks named

The real problem behind the surface one, with options and a recommended next step

How a business creates, delivers, and captures value — and where it is exposed

Where work is breaking, where capability is missing, and the one structural change worth making

Build, buy, partner, or wait — with the killer assumption named

Whether a specific partnership is worth pursuing — with the asymmetries named

The right financing structure for the opportunity — tested against fit, cost, and flexibility

A fundraise structured to close on terms worth living with

Every variance classified — structural, timing, one-off or noise — with the call the pattern demands

How long the cash lasts across three scenarios, with the killer assumption named

Whether the per-unit economics hold up — with the killer assumption named

Whether the pay set serves the talent strategy, with the cost of fixing it

A board report that lands the narrative, the KPIs, the exceptions, and the decisions requested

What metrics are missing, misleading, or quietly rewarding the wrong thing

A complete business plan ready to put in front of investors, partners, or a board

A career decision weighed against criteria that matter, with a pre-mortem and a verdict

What matters most, what you would give up, and what stays true under pressure

Which option holds up under income loss, rate moves, or a downturn

A relocation decision and plan, with the trade-offs each destination forces

What the culture is like — values in practice, leadership behaviour, and where the gap sits

Strategy clarity, alignment, talent density, ways of working, and trust in leadership

What's energising people, what's draining them, and the levers that would move engagement

The patterns in how a person handles pressure, conflict, collaboration, and decisions

PENDING — product being redesigned. See Replit brief.

How a person leads — defaults, strengths, blind spots, and development areas

Real strengths backed by evidence — and the cost each one carries when overplayed

The values revealed by what a person has held the line on, refused, or regretted

What every role owns, what's silently dropped, and which handoffs are breaking

Where the team is aligned on priorities and goals, and where dangerous gaps sit

Where trust, conflict handling, and accountability are strong — and where they break

Any subject explained to a real listener, scored on accuracy, depth, audience adaptation, and handling the unknown

A presentation rehearsal scored on lead argument, evidence, question response, and poise

A stakeholder-influence rehearsal scored on reading the room, framing, negotiation, and durability

A managing-up rehearsal scored on positioning, evidence, flexibility, and outcome

A meeting rehearsal scored on structure, air-time management, progress, and closure

The conversation that's been avoided, with an assessment of how the conversation went

A saying-no rehearsal scored on clarity, rationale, alternative, and relationship

A performance-conversation rehearsal scored on clarity, ownership, empathy, and path forward

A team-conflict rehearsal scored on directness, fairness, action, and aftercare

A hiring interview rehearsal scored on question design, follow-up, bias, and assessment integrity

A leadership crisis scored on decision quality, communication, strategy, and pressure response

A negotiation rehearsal scored on preparation, anchoring, concession pattern, and pressure response

A strategic-decision rehearsal scored on framing, information use, trade-off recognition, and time horizon

An ethics rehearsal where the right path is costly, scored on recognition and response

A prioritisation rehearsal scored on triage, trade-off recognition, communication, and revisability