Programs

People and HR · Facilitator-led

Compensation Cycle

The bands, the budget, the calibration and the defence of the outcome, in five weeks.

A five-week program for HR business partners and the managers who make pay recommendations, assigned by an HR director or reward lead, built on Renatus. One research report, two documents and three simulation rooms · Five weeks, one room in each of the first four and two in the last · Unlimited attempts · Ongoing thereafter.

5 weeks · 6 rooms · Total time 2 hours 55 min

Sign up to continue
Who it's for
HR business partners, reward partners and the heads of function who recommend pay for a layer of the organisation, and the HR director or reward lead who runs the cycle.
Cadence
5 weeks
Format
Facilitator-led
Program sessions
5

Who it's for

HR business partners, reward partners and the heads of function who recommend pay for a layer of the organisation, and the HR director or reward lead who runs the cycle.

Output

  • Three documents per participant before sign-off: a sourced market report on the role in doubt, every role in the client group against its band with a refresh costed at two levels, and the pay budget with every variance classified and the buried ones surfaced
  • A scored report after every simulation room, with the moment that earned each score and one recommended focus
  • A trajectory across every attempt, and for the HR director a Ren summary of each participant and a team report
  • Scored against published frameworks: pay band variance audit, retention concentration analysis, two-level refresh costing, variance classification discipline, buried-variance surfacing, decision-driven variance review, participatory facilitation, Roger Schwarz's ground rules, influence without authority (Cohen and Bradford), care and challenge, the Minto pyramid principle and Aristotelian rhetoric (Heinrichs)

Program contents

  1. Market reference — Salary & Compensation
  2. Pay against band — Employee Comp Review
  3. Budget discipline — Budget vs Plan Variance
  4. Chairing calibration — Meeting Facilitation
  5. The case upward · Defending the outcome — Managing Up · Presentation Under Pressure

How the program works

A five-week program for HR business partners and the managers who make pay recommendations, assigned by an HR director or reward lead, built on Renatus. One research report, two documents and three simulation rooms · Five weeks, one room in each of the first four and two in the last · Unlimited attempts · Ongoing thereafter.

The rooms

Salary & Compensation

Research

Set-up: the participant's perspective (name the pay review), the specific job title or role, the industry or sector, the geographic region and the list of specific countries, the seniority level, the years of experience, and the company size.

Employee Comp Review

Framework

Set-up: the company stage and headcount, current comp by role or function, the market reference bands and their source, what talent the company is trying to attract or retain, and who the review is for.

Budget vs Plan Variance

Framework

Set-up: the period being reviewed, what plan is being measured against, the headline budget lines and actuals, the variances already known to leadership, and who the variance review is for.

Meeting Facilitation

Simulation

Calibration: role title, the meeting type (stand-up, decision meeting, strategy session or difficult conversation forum), industry or sector, a brief description of working context, and the organisation website as an option.

Managing Up

Simulation

Calibration: role title, the power gap (peer-level senior, one-up, two-up or C-suite, named in the set-up note), industry or sector, a brief description of working context, and the organisation website as an option.

Presentation Under Pressure

Simulation

Calibration: role title, the audience (a single senior stakeholder, a board, an executive committee or a hostile external audience), industry or sector, a brief description of working context, and the organisation website as an option.

Why this program exists

HR business partners and the managers who recommend pay carry the annual cycle from the first band to the last letter: a market reference somebody has to stand behind, a pay position for every role, a budget already spent in places nobody has looked, a calibration meeting where the loudest head of function wins, and an executive committee that wants the whole proposal defended in twenty minutes. This program prepares them through one research report, two documents and three simulations. Ren researches the market for the role they name, builds the pay position and budget reading from the organisation's own numbers, then builds each meeting, conversation and presentation from the participant's real situation and plays every person in it, so every scene moves with what they say.

What you'll achieve

  1. The cycle's numbers in three documents: a sourced market report, a pay document with every role against its band and a refresh costed at two levels, and a budget document with every variance classified and the buried ones surfaced
  2. Rehearsal of the three scenes the cycle brings, as often as they want: the calibration meeting, the ask for the pool, and the committee's questions
  3. A scored report after every simulation: each dimension with the moment that earned its score, strengths, development areas and one recommended focus
  4. Unlimited attempts at every room, each a different scene for their current role, scored on the same dimensions and charted against every attempt before it

At a glance

Who it's for
HR business partners who carry a client group through the pay cycle, reward partners who own the bands, and the heads of function who recommend pay for a layer of the organisation and defend it upward. It is assigned by an HR director, reward lead or facilitator in the weeks before pay decisions are signed off, and the manager's lines here are for whoever that is. Every room calibrates to role, level and situation, so one cohort can hold a first-year business partner and a head of function with two hundred people. It assumes pay data by role, bands with a named source, and a pay budget with a plan behind it.
Cadence
5 weeks
1
Market reference · Salary & Compensation · Read the confidence ratings; check the role is the one in doubt
2
Pay against band · Employee Comp Review · Read the Retention Concentration and the Refresh Costing; check the bands used are the organisation's
3
Budget discipline · Budget vs Plan Variance · Read Buried and The Decision; read the three documents together
4
Chairing calibration · Meeting Facilitation · Read Closure and Air-time Management; read the Ren summary across four rooms
5
The case upward · Defending the outcome · Managing Up · Presentation Under Pressure · Read Grounding and Outcome; read Question Response and Poise; set the plan for sign-off

Session by session

1

Week 1: Market reference

Put a sourced figure, with its confidence stated, on the role whose band the organisation trusts least, before the pay document is built on it.

2

Week 2: Pay against band

Know where every role sits against its band, which cases matter for retention, and what a refresh costs at two levels, before calibration opens.

3

Week 3: Budget discipline

Know what the pay budget is doing against plan, which variances are structural and which are buried, before the refresh is spent against headroom that is not there.

4

Week 4: Chairing calibration

Chair a calibration meeting that ends with a decision, with the dominant voice managed and the quiet one heard.

The bands, the budget, the calibration and the defence of the outcome, in five weeks.

Sign up to continue
Meet Ren
Your AI strategist
We use essential cookies to keep you logged in and protect your session. Our only optional cookies remember your language preference — we don't track you or collect unnecessary data. Cookie Policy · Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Choose which cookies you'd like to allow. Essential cookies cannot be disabled as they are required for the platform to function.

Essential Cookies Always Active
Login sessions, security tokens, and consent preferences. Required for the platform to work.
Functional Cookies
Language preferences, display settings, and last accessed report. Disabling may affect personalisation.
Analytics Cookies
Aggregated, anonymised usage data to help improve the platform. Never used to identify you personally.